Most popular posts in '006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk)' category.
Archive for the '006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk)' Category
006-04 — We Cry for Renewal
Published by Jeff, on November 25th, 2001 in 006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk).SCRIPTURE: Habakkuk 3
Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away…Doesn’t it seem that all the greatest stories happened in the distant past in far off locations? Doesn’t it seem that God’s activity is just a part of history? When was the last time you saw God divide the waters of Lake Michigan? If God is eternally the same, then shouldn’t he be doing miraculous things today?
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 6% [?]
006-03 — God Promises Judgment
Published by Jeff, on November 18th, 2001 in 006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk).SCRIPTURE: Habakkuk 2:2ff
Finally, we’re getting somewhere. God promises Habakkuk that he will judge the wicked people of the world. However, the promise is not all rosy and happy. God’s promise for judgment contains some things that would scare even the most faithful follower. Do we have reason to be scared?
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 6% [?]
006-02 — We Cry for Consistency
Published by Jeff, on November 11th, 2001 in 006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk).SCRIPTURE: Habakkuk 1:5-2:1
God is sometimes very confusing. Just when we think we understand Him pretty well, He goes and does something that surprises us. This week, we will eavesdrop on Habakkuk’s prayer for God to show some more consistency in His dealings with people. Is it right for someone to ask God to be more consistent?
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 6% [?]
006-01 — We Cry for Justice
Published by Jeff, on November 4th, 2001 in 006 Calling God to Act (Habakkuk).SCRIPTURE: Habakkuk 1:1-4
I’m frustrated with a world full of rotten people who seem to succeed in life despite their wickedness, but I’m not alone. Habakkuk was a man who lived quite some time ago, but the issues he faced in his day are remarkably similar to those we face today.
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 6% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..