Most popular posts in '004 Seeking the Lost' category.
Archive for the '004 Seeking the Lost' Category
SCRIPTURE: Various
How would you feel if the king of all the land hired you to invest his money? How would you react? How would you invest it? What kind of investment do you think God wants us to be making for him? Listen up!
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 7% [?]
SCRIPTURE: Various
What are the odds of a good bet? Most smart people when faced with 99 to 1 odds would tend to side with the 99 over the 1. But what about those risk takers who bet on the 1? What happens if they actually win? High risk can mean high returns. Are you interested?
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 5% [?]
SCRIPTURE: Various
Jesus led an amazing ministry. He continually confused people with how he lived. What was it about his ministry that drove him forward? In this message we see how a party with a pagan revealed the core of Jesus’ ministry.
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 5% [?]


"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..