Most popular posts in '027 Shhhh! God’s Talking' category.
Archive for the '027 Shhhh! God’s Talking' Category
The Bible Can Be Trusted
Published by Jeff, on May 29th, 2005 in 027 Shhhh! God's Talking, Front Page, Sermons, Spiritual Health, Tough Questions.NWBC-027-03
The Bible is the single most accurate ancient document in existence today! Now that’s a big claim! Nevertheless, it’s true. The Bible is spiritually reliable, historically reliable, textually reliable, and reliable in many other ways too. In this message, I try to explain exactly why we can know it is so trustworthy.
Popularity: 7% [?]
God Wants You to Hear Him
Published by Jeff, on May 22nd, 2005 in 027 Shhhh! God's Talking, Front Page, Podcasts, Sermons, Spiritual Health.NWBC-027-02
It’s true. God really wants you to hear him. The Bible isn’t an esoteric , spiritually difficult book like many have sometimes thought. Sure, there are some editions that have ancient Shakespeare-like language, but God doesn’t speak King James English. God speaks to our hearts by speaking through his servants. God wants you to hear him!
Popularity: 7% [?]
Can You Hear Him?
Published by Jeff, on May 17th, 2005 in 027 Shhhh! God's Talking, Front Page, Podcasts.NWBC-027-01
This is the first message of the series. It’s just an introduction to the whole series, but in it I identify three important truths about the Bible:
- You can hear God’s voice in your Bible.
- You can understand your Bible.
- You can live by your Bible.
I also deal with this important passage:
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17
Listen up to hear how God’s Word prepares us for God’s work.
Popularity: 7% [?]
Shhhh! God’s Talking!
Published by Jeff, on May 17th, 2005 in 027 Shhhh! God's Talking, Front Page, Sermons.NWBC-027
In this series of messages, I’m going to explore what it means to hear God’s voice through the pages of your Bible. We’ll talk about the specifics of how to read and understand the Bible better. We’ll talk about how we got the Bible. We’ll deal with difficult passages too.
One of the key features of this series is that we will be dealing with difficult passages and questions about the Bible submitted by people in my congregation. If you would like to get in on it, just submit a difficult passage here online, or ask me any other question about the Bible, and I’ll try to address it in one way or another.
Popularity: 7% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..