Most popular posts in '029 Taste and See' category.
Archive for the '029 Taste and See' Category
SCRIPTURE: Various
To help us develop a taste for God, I’m going to spend the rest of my time at Northwest Baptist highlighting seven key attributes of God. We are going to talk about who God is. In this first message, I dig into the deep concept of God being eternal. We’ll find out once again that God’s eternal nature means he is better than anything else.
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 3% [?]
Various Scriptures
The second message in this series is all about helping us truly grasp
that God is the treat and everything else is only a trick. There are at
least four reasons why. Listen up to find out!
Download
Now
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons
Popularity: 4% [?]
Psalm
34
With this message, I’m starting a brand new series that I hope to
accomplish two things:
- Help to increase your appetite for knowing God.
- Help you to realize that whatever effort it takes to know God better will be worth it.
With this first message, I dig into
Psalm
34 to show that we will experience God’s goodness if we seek
him.
Download
Now
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons
Popularity: 4% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..