Most popular posts in '009 The Long Road Ahead' category.
Archive for the '009 The Long Road Ahead' Category
SCRIPTURE: Luke 9:28-36
Jesus knew that the journey would be a long one and so did his Father in Heaven. But once he made the decision to follow the planned route, the Father blessed him with a spiritual energy boost, filling his spiritual tanks. Are your tanks filled?
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 3% [?]
SCRIPTURE: Luke 9:18-27
There came a deciding point in Jesus’ life when he had to double check the map and make his decision about which way he would go. Was he going to go to the cross? Was he going to walk away from it? He checked his map. He made his choice.
- Subscribe to this series by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. This Series
- Subscribe to all sermons by dragging this link to your podcast software or RSS reader. All Sermons.
Popularity: 3% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..