Most popular posts in 'Sermons' category.
Archive for the 'Sermons' Category
037-04 What if they found out?
Published by Jeff, on October 28th, 2007 in 037 UNCHAINED, Front Page.
| Download Audio | Download Notesheet |
Beyond regrets, one powerful force that can chain us to our past is our desire to keep some things secret. Secrets have a power all their own, and we tend to spend a great deal of energy keeping our secrets just that—secret. Is there a way to get unchained and find freedom from the secrets we keep? I try to answer that question through this message.
Popularity: 88% [?]
| Download Audio | Download Notesheet | Download Video |
This week, I tackled one of the most damaging kinds of regrets we can face. It’s the kind of regret that comes from being victimized. And the most dangerous part about it is that we can bury our sense of victimization rather than deal with it in a healthy way. Watch this service to see how God wants us to deal with past victimization and even present relational conflicts.
Popularity: 55% [?]
| Download Audio | Download Notesheet |
Regrets can be a powerful force in our lives whether we are aware of them or not. In this message, I deal with the difficult task of facing our regrets and coming to terms with them. This is the first in a series of messages on getting unchained from our past.
Popularity: 45% [?]
036-07 Why We Do What We Do
Published by Jeff, on September 30th, 2007 in 036 WHY: Life's Biggest Questions, Front Page.
|
Download Audio
|
Download Notesheet
|
Download Video
|
In this message, I deal with the question of why Southside Church exists in the first place and why we do what we are doing as a church. This vision message concludes our WHY campaign!
Popularity: 66% [?]
036-06 Why Jesus?
Published by Jeff, on September 23rd, 2007 in 036 WHY: Life's Biggest Questions, Front Page.
In this message, I address Jesus’ claims to exclusivity. Why do Christians believe that Jesus is the only way to God? Isn’t that narrow-minded? Well, that’s what Jesus taught, so we need to understand what he meant!
Popularity: 31% [?]
036-05 Why Do Science and the Bible Conflict?
Published by Jeff, on September 16th, 2007 in 036 WHY: Life's Biggest Questions, Front Page.
|
Download Audio
|
Download Notesheet
|
For over 500 years, the church has been in conflict of some kind with scientific minded people. Why is that? What’s the solution?
In this message, I deal with the apparent conflict between science and the Bible, cover some ground in the Creation vs. Evolution debate, and discuss the limits of both scientific knowledge and biblical knowledge. Definitely thought-provoking.
Popularity: 16% [?]
036-04 Why Is the World So Messed Up?
Published by Jeff, on September 9th, 2007 in 036 WHY: Life's Biggest Questions, Front Page.
|
Download Audio
|
Download Notesheet
|
If you had the power to stop it, how much pain would you allow a loved one to experience before intervening? That’s the question Pastor Jeff leads with in this message.
The fourth week of our WHY> campaign has me teaching about how we can believe in a good God when the world is so messed up and what difference that belief makes in our lives.
Popularity: 15% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..