How do I subscribe to your blog?
Subscribing to blogs you like is a very good way to keep track of recent posts so you can stay up to date without having to visit the blog site every day. There are a number of ways you can subscribe to this blog.
- For people who aren’t as comfortable with the latest internet technologies, I provide a good old fashioned automatic email feature. Whenever I add new content to this site, you can automatically get emailed a brief excerpt so you can choose whether you want to visit my site to read the whole thing or not. After you subscribe, don’t forget to visit the link sent to you in the confirmation email to update your email preferences and to choose which categories you want to subscribe to.
For those who are in to podcasts, I provide some old sermons as a podcast right from this site. If you use iTunes as your podcast downloader, you can subscribe to my podcast simply by clicking on this link:
However, to get my most recent sermons, you’ll need to subscribe to my church podcast by visiting http://lafayettecc.org/news/If you are interested in using the more advanced web technology known as syndication, you can subscribe to my feeds. Instructions for doing this are beyond the scope of this page, so I’ll just point you to the Wikipedia article on RSS feeds and give you the following tips:
- To use RSS feeds from this or any other site, you need to have a feed reader program installed on your computer, or you can use a web-based feed reader.
- If you don’t know whether you have a feed reader installed, or if you aren’t sure how to use it, I recommend you click on this feedburner link to get started…
Finally, for those of you who know why it matters…
Happy feed reading!
Popularity: 3% [?]
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..