Protected: Chapter 4
Published by Jeff, on November 6th, 2008 in .Popularity: unranked [?]
This post is password protected. Enter the password to view comments.
jeff mikels
…trying to become more like Jesus.
Author
- Hi, I'm Jeff Mikels, guitar player, computer nerd, dad, husband, and founding pastor of Lafayette Community Church in Lafayette, Indiana, but mostly a follower of Jesus trying to lead people closer to him wherever they are.
According to one personality test,
I am an ENTHUSIAST
(The Busy, Fun-Loving Type: Spontaneous, Versatile, Acquisitive, and Scattered)
Some of my Best Posts
Search
Google Shared Items- The “Everyone is on vacation, anything goes” church service. (AKA tomorrow.)
- Woe to Me if I Don’t Evangelize
- Taking church off in the summer.
- Complaining.
- Creating a Culture of Courage
- Processing Your Work is Part of Your Work
- Men, Temptation, and the Gospel
- How to Honor Your Wife
- Rethinking Spiritual Growth
- THE MANIFESTO MANIFESTO - Kim Mok
- My Friend Feed
- Callcentric - VoIP Internet phone service February 4, 2012
- Preparing for Commitment Sunday 2012 February 3, 2012
- Spiritual Coaching Workbook February 3, 2012
- Custom Book Pricing, Self Published Book Costs | Blurb January 21, 2012
- Compatible Okidata 43381701 Yellow Drum Kit January 14, 2012
- Okidata C5500N January 14, 2012
"Our biochemistry is about 97% the same as a mouse.
Our biochemistry is about 50% the same as a banana.
Human Cytochrom 'C' is closest to that of a sunflower.
Human eyes are closest to the eyes of an octopus.
Human skin is closest to that of a pig."
Explain to me, how this fits in with primates??? With all due respect, i think his aim with "god set it up that way" was meant to be an insult of some kind. He sounds very passionate about this subject and with passion comes biases. While i'm not researched in anyway on this specific argument, generally speaking i'm convinced these people only look at their "evidence" with one prospective; 1st proves evolution or doesn't.. They don't even consider any other possibility of what it could mean..Taken at face value because i don't know anything about the human gnome and could be missing key things due to pure ignorance. Start of video; You had plenty of time to research and form a "theory" on something then proceed to drop this well researched project on someone and expect them to refute you on the drop of dime?? I dont think you need a PHD to say; you should allow someone to try refute your findings within a respectable time frame. That seems like the most objective thing to do. Although i think this would show insecurity on "Ken's" part. (To have holes punched in something your just presenting would be kind embarrassing. or was it arrogance?) Rest of video: Sounds like its not an exact match, "within 15 bases", and something about Telomeres not belonging? The choice of "correspond with" instead of something like is "exactly like", implicates some differences as well?.. But i could be completely wrong.. "no reason, no rhyme" sounds like he is insulting the bible as well. Would be very interested in hearing a completely objective view on these findings..